Blog
Hospitals Discourage C-Sections
Posted by: Stan Heller
April 19, 2007
Topic: Birth News (Obstetrics)
Nearly three in 10 U.S. mothers are giving birth by Caesarean section and more seem to be choosing a surgical birth even when there's no clear medical need. No one knows exactly how many C-sections are purely elective. Some estimates suggest there could be tens of thousands annually, and critics say many of those women were pressured into surgery or didn't know the risks. There are good reasons to avoid C-sections, if possible. First, they increase, though very slightly, the risk to the mother. Second, they leave a uterine scar, which can cause problems in future pregnancies. But third, they cost more money than vaginal deliveries.
Sometimes, however, a c-section is the only way to ensure your baby is delivered safely. I’m sure you believe that your obstetrician wouldn’t let the cost differential sway her from doing what’s best for you and you are probably right. What you aren’t being told, however, is that your obstetrician’s hospital and managed care organizations care very much about the cost and they are leaning on your obstetrician not to do C-sections.
How? They keep track and calculate a C-section rate for every obstetrician. If she’s at 30%, when the “guideline” is 25%, she may get a call from her section chief. And she may get calls from the various managed care entities she contracts with. They threaten to label her an “over-utilizer.” They need say nothing more. It’s understood that these are “friendly” warnings before the powers that be start playing hardball. Times have truly changed when one of the things doctors fear most is to labeled an “over-utilizer.”
There can hardly be a more vulnerable position for a woman to be in. She’s in labor and in pain. There are indications of trouble. She has no idea (unless she herself is an obstetrician) what the various “things” mean nor what should be done. She has to trust her obstetrician to properly balance the risks between waiting and intervening -a quintessential exercise of judgment, to be sure, but the woman has a right for that judgment to exercised solely for the benefit of herself and her fetus, not for the obstetrician’s statistics.
News
Personal Injury
[07/22] Woman runs sword into foot during Wiccan ceremony
[07/18] NY man loses prosthetic leg while skydiving
[07/18] Fisherman hooks drowning man and reels him in
[07/18] 5,000 gallons of molasses spill on Texas highway
[07/10] Man sues Tenn. church over spiritual fall
[07/08] Truck rams Concorde, knocks off its nose in NYC
[07/11] Lightning claims 5 young lives in a week
[07/22] Women on antidepressants may benefit from Viagra
[07/21] Mass. patient tested for brain disorder
[07/17] Cleveland Clinic taking kidneys through navel
Read More
Topics
Animal Health
Birth News (Obstetrics)
Breast Cancer News
Consumer Rights And Medical Malpractice Reform
Hospital News
Medical Devices
Medical Error: Medications and Overdose
Medical Error: Misdiagnosis
Medical Research
Nursing Home Care
Pediatric News
Recent Updates
March 27, 2008
Narcotic Overdose and Other Problems
March 27, 2008
Accessing Medical Records
October 25, 2007
Drug Manufacturers Wake-Up And Pull OTC Cold Medications
October 25, 2007
Doctor Discipline
August 21, 2007
How Doctors Think
August 21, 2007
Why Doctors Don?t Disclose Errors: It Isn?t Fear of Medical Malpractice Suits
August 21, 2007
The Problem Of The Shortage of Doctors
August 21, 2007
Is The Cerebral Palsy Research Rigged?
July 07, 2007
Medicare To Stop Paying When Hospitals Cause Injury
July 07, 2007
Leading Conservative Activist Seeks Punitive Damages

